2008 OT Conference - Feedback survey

Your position: Main page Feedback survey Overall survey result

Feedback survey - Overall Survey result

14 to 17 November, 2008

"2008 International Occupational Therapy Conference"
Feedback survey analysis

There were total 225 delegates registered to join the conference (including speakers), the conference organizer received 92 no. of completed feedback questionnaires, the response rate is 40.9%.
The questionnaires were distributed in both Chinese and English, the questions and contents were the same.

Download Original feedback questionnaire Download Feedback survey analysis Download Feedback survey analysis

Date of complete questionnaire

No. of respondent:	64
Date	No.
14 November, 2009	2
15 November, 2009	9
16 November, 2009	35
17 November, 2009	18

Date of complete questionnaire

Delegate's information

Date of attendance

Date of attendance	No.
14 November, 2009	45
15 November, 2009	46
16 November, 2009	49
17 November, 2009	30
Not answer this question	41

Date of attendance

Where did you come from?

No. of respondent:	92
Response	No.	100%
China (* Remarks)	55	59.8%
Hong Kong	26	28.3%
Taiwan	4	4.3%
Macau	2	2.2%
Australia	1	1.1%
U.K.	1	1.1%
U.S.A.	3	3.3%

Where did you come from?

*Remarks:

China: Beijing (3), Chongqing Province (2), Jilin Province (6), Sichuan Province (12), Guangdong Province (9), Henan Province (2), Gansu Province (2), Yunnan Province (6), Hebei Province (1), Hunan Province (1)、Shandong Province (1)、Fujian Province (2), Province was not indicated (8)

What is your profession?

No. of respondent:	92
Response	No.	100%
Occupational therapist	49	53.3%
Physiotherapist	1	1.1%
Nurse	1	1.1%
Rehabilitation therapist	6	6.5%
Doctor (Rehabilitation)	13	14.1%
Teacher	1	1.1%
Other rehabilitation professional	2	2.2%
Student	6	6.5%
College/university instructor/professor	7	7.6%
Hospital/Organization administrator	1	1.1%
Doctor (Other specialty) (* Remarks)	5	5.4%

What is your profession?

*Remarks:

Doctor (Other specialty) - Orthopaedics & traumatology (1), Orthopaedics (2), Endocrinology (1), Specialty was not indicated (1)

What is the type of your working organization?

No. of respondent:	92
Response	No.	100%
Integrated hospital	38	41.3%
Rehabilitation hospital	17	18.5%
Community rehabilitation center	9	9.8%
School/College	6	6.5%
University	15	16.3%
Others (* Remarks)	7	7.6%

What is the type of your working organization?

*Remarks:

Others - Disabled Person's Federation (2), Government (1), Rehabilitation for autistic children (1), Occupational Health Company (1), N.G.O. (Children with special needs) (1), Paediatric (1)

Conference’s organization & arrangement

Pre-conference organization

4.1

Enrollment & registration

Average marks:

4.44

No. of respondent:	89
Marks	No.	100%
5 marks (Very satisfactory)	50	56.2%
4 marks	28	31.5%
3 marks	11	12.4%
2 marks	0	0.0%
1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)	0	0.0%

Enrollment & registration

4.2

Conference news

Average marks:

4.28

No. of respondent:	88
Marks	No.	100%
5 marks (Very satisfactory)	42	47.7%
4 marks	31	35.2%
3 marks	14	15.9%
2 marks	0	0.0%
1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)	1	1.1%

Conference news

4.3

Conference registration fee

Average marks:

4.21

No. of respondent:	84
Marks	No.	100%
5 marks (Very satisfactory)	37	44.0%
4 marks	29	34.5%
3 marks	17	20.2%
2 marks	1	1.2%
1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)	0	0.0%

Conference registration fee

Pre-conference organization - Summary:

	Average
Enrollment & registration	4.44
Conference news	4.28
Conference registration fee	4.21

Pre-conference organization - Summary

Conference arrangement

5.1

Registration arrangement

Average marks:

4.33

No. of respondent:	85
Marks	No.	100%
5 marks (Very satisfactory)	44	51.8%
4 marks	28	32.9%
3 marks	10	11.8%
2 marks	3	3.5%
1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)	0	0.0%

Registration arrangement

5.2

Length of conference period

Average marks:

4.28

No. of respondent:	89
Marks	No.	100%
5 marks (Very satisfactory)	35	39.3%
4 marks	45	50.6%
3 marks	8	9.0%
2 marks	1	1.1%
1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)	0	0.0%

Length of conference period

5.3

Programme rundown

Average marks:

4.38

No. of respondent:	88
Marks	No.	100%
5 marks (Very satisfactory)	44	50.0%
4 marks	35	39.8%
3 marks	7	8.0%
2 marks	2	2.3%
1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)	0	0.0%

Programme rundown

5.4

Venue

Average marks:

4.39

No. of respondent:	87
Marks	No.	100%
5 marks (Very satisfactory)	45	51.7%
4 marks	32	36.8%
3 marks	9	10.3%
2 marks	1	1.1%
1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)	0	0.0%

Venue

5.5

Audio and visual effect

Average marks:

4.28

No. of respondent:	88
Marks	No.	100%
5 marks (Very satisfactory)	40	45.5%
4 marks	35	39.8%
3 marks	12	13.6%
2 marks	0	0.0%
1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)	1	1.1%

Audio and visual effect

5.6

Conference proceedings

Average marks:

4.22

No. of respondent:	87
Marks	No.	100%
5 marks (Very satisfactory)	39	44.8%
4 marks	33	37.9%
3 marks	12	13.8%
2 marks	1	1.1%
1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)	2	2.3%

Conference proceedings

5.7

Hospital visit

Average marks:

4.37

No. of respondent:	62
Marks	No.	100%
5 marks (Very satisfactory)	30	48.4%
4 marks	26	41.9%
3 marks	5	8.1%
2 marks	1	1.6%
1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)	0	0.0%

Hospital visit

5.8

Scholarship

Average marks:

4.29

No. of respondent:	58
Marks	No.	100%
5 marks (Very satisfactory)	25	43.1%
4 marks	26	44.8%
3 marks	6	10.3%
2 marks	1	1.7%
1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)	0	0.0%

Scholarship

Conference arrangement - Summary:

	Average
Registration arrangement	4.33
Length of conference period	4.28
Programme rundown	4.38
Venue	4.39
Audio and Visual effect	4.28
Conference proceedings	4.22
Hospital visit	4.37
Scholarship	4.29

Conference arrangement - Summary

Scientific Programme

Please choose at most 2 topics from the Plenary sessions which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

P1:	Occupational therapy education in Mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan – Development and future challenge
P2:	OT's contribution during and after disaster
P3:	New techniques and development in occupational therapy
P4:	Development of occupational therapy in the community

No. of respondent:	88
Chosen session	No.
P1	40
P2	34
P3	55
P4	34

2 topics from the Plenary sessions which you interested most and was/were practical to you

Please choose at most 3 topics from the Symposium sessions which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

	I have not attended any symposium session
A:	Occupational therapy in neurological rehabilitation
B:	Occupational therapy for hand & foot surgery
C:	Occupational therapy in paediatric rehabilitation
D:	Occupational therapy education
E:	Community occupational therapy
F:	Vocational rehabilitation
G:	Experience sharing on rehabilitation & occupational therapy after Sichuan earthquake
H:	Sharing of experience by overseas occupational therapists working in Mainland China

No. of respondent:	88
Chosen session	No.
Not attend	1
A	41
B	26
C	32
D	29
E	34
F	20
G	29
H	12

Please choose at most 3 topics from the Symposium sessions which you interested most and was/were practical to you

Please choose at most 2 topics from the Symposium sessions “(A) Occupational therapy in neurological rehabilitation” which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

	I have not attended any symposium session of “(A) Occupational therapy in neurological rehabilitation”
S1A:	Assessment in Neuro-rehabilitation
S2A:	Management of hemiplegic upper limb
S3A:	Functional training in neuro-rehabilitation
S4A:	Cognitive-perceptual training in neuro-rehabilitation

No. of respondent:	84
Chosen session	No.
Not attend	24
S1A	20
S2A	30
S3A	23
S4A	25

Please choose at most 2 topics from the Symposium sessions “(A) Occupational therapy in neurological rehabilitation” which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

Please choose 1 topic from the Symposium sessions “(B) Occupational therapy for hand & foot surgery” which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

	I have not attended any symposium session of “(B) Occupational therapy for hand & foot surgery”
S1B:	Occupational therapy for hand & foot surgery (1)
S2B:	Occupational therapy for hand & foot surgery (2)
S3B:	Occupational therapy for hand & foot surgery (3)

No. of respondent:	82
Chosen session	No.
Not attend	46
S1B	20
S2B	14
S3B	7

Please choose 1 topic from the Symposium sessions “(B) Occupational therapy for hand & foot surgery” which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

10.

Please choose at most 2 topics from the Symposium sessions “(C) Occupational therapy in paediatric rehabilitation” which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

	I have not attended any symposium session of “(A) Occupational therapy in neurological rehabilitation”
S1C:	Occupational therapy functional training for children
S2C:	Community integration for children
S3C:	Sensory integrative therapy
S4C:	Rehabilitation in Paediatric

No. of respondent:	85
Chosen session	No.
Not attend	33
S1C	33
S2C	16
S3C	20
S4C	19

Please choose at most 2 topics from the Symposium sessions “(C) Occupational therapy in paediatric rehabilitation” which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

11.

Free paper sessions

11.1

Appropriateness

Average marks:

4.16

No. of respondent:	82
Marks	No.	100%
5 marks (Very satisfactory)	31	37.8%
4 marks	35	42.7%
3 marks	15	18.3%
2 marks	0	0.0%
1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)	1	1.2%

Appropriateness

11.2

Academic level

Average marks:

4.16

No. of respondent:	82
Marks	No.	100%
5 marks (Very satisfactory)	34	41.5%
4 marks	30	36.6%
3 marks	16	19.5%
2 marks	1	1.2%
1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)	1	1.2%

Academic level

11.3

Presentation skills

Average marks:

3.98

No. of respondent:	82
Marks	No.	100%
5 marks (Very satisfactory)	27	32.9%
4 marks	32	39.0%
3 marks	18	22.0%
2 marks	4	4.9%
1 marks (Very unsatisfactory)	1	1.2%

Presentation skills

Free paper sessions - Summary:

	Average
Appropriateness	4.16
Academic level	4.16
Presentation skills	3.98

Free paper sessions - Summary

12.

Please choose at most 2 topics from the Post-conference workshops which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

	I have not attended any post-conference workshops
W2:	Establishment of an occupational therapy unit for hand rehabilitation
W3:	Enhancing the independent living skills for children with autism
W4:	Swallowing assessment and training
W5:	Splintage for peripheral nerve injuries of hands
W6:	Seating system

No. of respondent:	82
Chosen session	No.
Not attend	36
W2	18
W3	21
W4	16
W5	17
W6	10

Please choose at most 2 topics from the Post-conference workshops which you interested most and was/were practical to you:

13.

Have you joined the hospital visits?

	I have not joined any hospital visit.
V1:	15/11 - University City Hospital of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, & The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
V2:	17/11 - Guangdong Provincial Work Injury Rehabilitation Center

No. of respondent:	84
Chosen session	No.
Not attend	50
V1	25
V2	12

Have you joined the hospital visits?

Other opinions

14.

Overall satisfaction level?

No. of respondent:	86
Response	No.	100%
Satisfactory	80	93.0%
No opinion	5	5.8%
Not satisfactory	1	1.2%

Overall satisfaction level?

15.

How and where did you know about this conference?

No. of respondent:

Opinions:

01.	From colleagues.
02.	E-mail.
03.	网络。
04.	香港职业治疗学院网站。
05.	Invited to attend.
06.	单位提供。
07.	报到通知。
08.	From my department manager.
09.	Email.
10.	Colleagues.
11.	吉林省慈善总会。
12.	E-mail.
13.	中华慈善总会。
14.	收到通知资料（但有些晚）
15.	中华物理医学康复网站、中国康复医学会网站。
16.	Email from OT friends.
17.	老师介绍。
18.	老师宣传。
19.	Email.
20.	By E-mail & invitation.
21.	老师通知。
22.	老师。
23.	中华慈善总会。
24.	E-mail / Colleagues.
25.	网站。
26.	Colleagues, circulation
27.	网上信息。
28.	网站。
29.	中华慈善总会。
30.	慈善总会通知。
31.	中华慈善总会通知。
32.	通知。
33.	from HKOTA.
34.	Hospital.
35.	HKOTA.
36.	医院通知。
37.	Well-organized.
38.	from professor's suggestion.
39.	接到邀请函。
40.	I knew about this conference from my colleagues in our hospital.
41.	My hospital give me the information.
42.	Internet.
43.	APOT.
44.	Over internet.
45.	From internet.
46.	通过香港职业治疗学院、中华慈善总会。
47.	From MOTA.
48.	HKIOT & Leung Kwok-fai
49.	吉林省慈善总会。
50.	e-mail, website.
51.	吉林省慈善总会通知。
52.	吉林省慈善总会。
53.	From my advisor.
54.	From the HKIOT website & through my supervisor.
55.	Internet.
56.	从同仁中得知。
57.	Through e-mail.
58.	From first conference.
59.	吉林省慈善总会。
60.	Invited / sponsor.
61.	传真数据和电话。
62.	第二届北京康复国际论坛参会会场发的通知。
63.	通过网络通知。
64.	大会通知。
65.	慈善会通知。
66.	香港职业治疗学院。
67.	老师告知。
68.	通过香港职业治疗学会。
69.	通过香港职业治疗学院。
70.	通过香港职业治疗学院。
71.	联网。

16.

Will you join such similar occupational therapy conference in the future?

No. of respondent:	87
Response	No.	100%
Yes	76	87.4%
No	1	1.1%
Depends	10	11.5%

Will you join such similar occupational therapy conference in the future?

17.

Will you recommend your colleagues to join such similar occupational therapy conference in the future?

No. of respondent:	87
Response	No.	100%
Yes	80	92.0%
No	0	0.0%
Depends	7	8.0%

Will you recommend your colleagues to join such similar occupational therapy conference in the future?

18.

Other opinions:

No. of respondent:

Opinions:

01.	A very good conference with fruitful sharings!
02.	(1) 20 min presentation was too short in general. I think in-depth thinking process would not be stimulated under such constraint. (2) Some of the presentations were not really constructive but rather misleading. We might need to screen the application and tried to keep the standard of the conference.
03.	(1) 医院参观与学习班同时进行，面临两难选择。 (2) 增加对讲者评分，以使下一次给评分优秀的讲者多点时间。 (3) 会议己具很高适切性，但以后可否再进一步把一些泛泛而谈的讲座删除。
04.	(1) 希望大会后有关负责人将大会期间各位专家及学术报告者、专题学习班的有关资料上传主网站。 (2) 作为一名治疗师，又能更加注重了解治疗技术方面的信息，望今后研讨会能更多有关治疗技术方法的专题。
05.	Sometimes due to the very interesting topics, too many speakers in one session so felt a little rushed. But overall an excellent conference - very friendly & welcoming to foreign guests. An inspiring conference. Meaningful.
06.	课程安排太急。
07.	Thank you to the organisers.
08.	(1) 在会议程序安排上能否让学员有更多机会去参加我们感与趣的课题讲座，而不是设立过多的分会场，而我们却分身乏术。 (2) 讲者的课件或资料能否更全面、详尽。 (3) 能否多一些关于临床慢性病所引发的公共心理卫生问题方面的研究及处理方法，因为在内地很多地区，学科的融合比较多，尤其在基层医院及小区，我们不会把自己划分的特别细（在学科上），因为我们必需帮助那些需要帮助的人。非常感谢大会上那些专家的精彩讲座，在学习知识的同时，也让我们领略了各位专家及他们所代表的地区的人文精神。
09.	(1) 不能听到各会场的内容。 (2) 提问、交流时间太紧张。 (3) 实用内容过少（操作、训练方法），交流不够。 (4) 资料少（会议）。 (5) 通讯簿、联系方式没有。
10.	(1) 希望进一步创建丰富相应组织的网站，更多的进行交流。 (2) 希望将讲者的PPT以及本次录像、照片放在网上，大家来分享。 (3) 本次大会很成功，谢谢辛你们辛苦的付出，我们永远记在心里。
11.	(1) 不断规范与普及各专科的OT治疗理论与操作。 (2) 在实践中把所学知识融合贯通、不断提高。 (3) OT学会不一定是吸收OT治疗师，有与趣参加之医生、心理治疗师等也可吸纳。 (4) 有些专题只是引用了书上和他人的做法，例如S1B.2。
12.	无。
13.	以后多开展类似培训班。
14.	无。
15.	无。
16.	It is a very good opportunity to gather different place experts to share & learn from each other. The development of OT in Mainland China still at beginning phase, this conference can stimulate better development of OT service in Mainland China. I also agree that Taiwan is good place to organize OT conference in coming year. I very impressed by Mr. Leung Kwok Fai lecture on occupation life style re-design, OT contribute not just focus on independence which sometime miss-direct my mind, OT can contribute QoL which help our client to live happily, engages meaningful life.
17.	时间有限，不能所有议程都参加造成很大的遗憾，如果在议程安排上能够多做些改动，可以让每个参加会议的人尽可能多的参加其它课题的演讲会更好！因为内地的康复并不像香港或者国外分得如此详细、多了解、涉及各个领域都是很有必要的！知识是无价的，也是无尽的，更希望专家们可以跟我们一起分享，如果能够较为全面的收集大会演讲的数据并加以学习，我想更不失为一次学习交流的机会！真正达到知识共享！好东西应该一起分享！
18.	- 对不起！发觉此Conference内，一部份讲者的质数实在有问题 - 表达内容缺乏清楚解释，内容 too shallow, not practical！ - 希望下次能有质量控制，或给某些有份量的讲员多些时间演讲。但感谢大会能把中国康复发展作出详细报告，特别是四川地震及其它国内外有经验的专家分享。提议需搜请有良好职业操守的演讲者。
19.	Recommend to add topics about "West meets East" in the conference.
20.	No smoking in the building.
21.	Combine local traveling.
22.	(1) 请在以后的学术研讨会中，多提一些对康复治疗技术专业教育方面的一些建议或要求，即如何培养一个符合社会、康复要求的专业康复治疗人材。 (2) 希望将此次研讨会的内容、录像、照片等全部发到网站上，以满足不同层次人士查阅的要求！！！
23.	None.
24.	None.
25.	会场有两条大柱，阻了视线，音响有时太小。
26.	Offer more papers for us, if possible. Thanks!
27.	My opinion should not carry much weight - This was a great experience - wonderful topics and presenters and participants. Thank you for the opportunity to participate!
28.	Appreciate if HKIOT can invite more OT speakers from different countries for sharing, e.g. Australia, Singapore, Western Europe, etc.
29.	(1) 和专家讨论的时间过短。 (2) 内容很全面，但新的技术不多。 (3) 希望能再多一些适用性的技术来推广。 (4) OT在天灾人祸中已经起到很大的作用，对于这次四川的大地震，我们康复工作者又真的能做什么？
30.	如果可以，想知道参会专家的E-mail，方便我们向专家学习。
31.	Thank you!
32.	(1) 和专家讨论的时间过短。 (2) 学习的时间短，内容不是很全面。
33.	Congratulations to the organizing committee again for an excellent conference with the right amount of international involvement as well as opportunities for local presentation & sharing. The inclusion of the participants from Taiwan also added an excellent perspective. Congratulations on a job well done! Thanks for your dedication!
34.	请多关注内地医院的OT发展，特别中医医院的OT发展。
35.	建议在黄会长能在深圳龙城医院办一次职业康复培训班。联系人：深圳龙城医院、安云龙电话：15818736911
36.	我来自东北，对粤语普通话听得不是很清楚。下一期应多一些图片或视频、影像，更直接一些。有机会可否参观一下香港自闭症儿童的康复过程，或广州一些好的机构。
37.	通过多渠道宣传，使更多的人知道这个会，以便有机会来参加会议。能在会议中安排一些环节以具体的case来示教。谢谢你们的努力，希望坚持办下去，相信作业治疗在内地一定会发展起来的，相信你们也相信我们，2008年我们的队伍不是比2005年大多了吗？hkiot741741